More ...
The author first presents some theoretical sociological premises relevant to research on international migrations. In this respect, he draws attention to conjunction of theoretical premises, referring to the inter-ethnic relations with communications, migrations, social and ethnic stratification and mobility. These theoretical premises are used to form a typology of emigrants, but they are also important for research into various types of migration policies.
Further developed is the idea of a common Slovene cultural space (Slovenia proper, Slovenes in neighboring countries, emigrants and their communities), which the author defines as a pluralistic social space - a reference to ethnic construction, within which occur various relations among the several categories of Slovenes and their descendants. He cites the reasons why the idea of a Slovene space is feasible: little concentration of this space, numerical smallness, underdevelopment of the Slovene nation.
In the empirical part of this paper, the author presents some discoveries about cooperation within the common Slovene cultural space, as shown in opinion polls in Slovenia, and especially in the polls among the opinion settlers – various professional categories of intellectuals. In Slovenia, the idea of a common Slovene cultural space has met with good reception and response. Results of studies on willingness to cooperate with various categories of Slovenes abroad and on different levels of awareness of Slovene emigrant communities are presented.
Empirical facts suggest ways in which to broaden and intensify mutual cooperation between Slovenia proper and the Slovenes and their descendants abroad. Major emphasis is given to the enhancement of scientific, economic and informational cooperation. However, proposals do not neglect cultural, athletic and political cooperation. In the latter case, foremost is the idea of taking into consideration the opinions of Slovene countrymen abroad whenever making decisions important for the development of Slovenia. Empirical research also reveals the obligations Slovenia has to the Slovene communities abroad and the manner implementing its cooperation with them. The order of proposals points towards an enhanced and increased flow of information material and its contextual improvement, cooperation with those Slovene communities abroad with which Slovenia does not yet cooperate, establishment of scientific Slovene institutions abroad, cooperation with institutions of Slovene communities abroad, support for education of Slovene countrymen in their homeland, providing information on the activities of Slovene communities abroad in the Slovene media, through cultural contracts, in Slovene schools abroad, and through cooperation in sports. Critical evaluations of the present level of cooperation and proposals for future cooperation show that cooperation among Slovenes and their countrymen should be realistic, open, pluralistic, integral, innovative, modern, multi-directional, dynamic, rational, of enhanced quality and that it should be spread into new areas within all autonomous categories of the common Slovene cultural space.
In the final section we read about the feasibility and actuality of mutual cooperation among all parts and categories of the common Slovene cultural space.